i was mainly meaning your replies to the original post (and then to beeker's)
the OP took the time to post the stats, which many may find useful and you shoot him down saying it was a waste of time, then used that as a platform to fulfill your agenda.
your reply seemed a little abrasive and, considering your background, i read the rest of your reply as a sales pitch. which may not have been the intention but each successive reply you made seemed to confirm this.
to me the first sling of mud was from you at faceless companies who use generic tunes and charge the earth'.
from anyone else this would be an innocuous enough statement but, as you continually point out, you are their competition. just seems a bit off imo.
perhaps i'm reading too much into your posts, but possibly something to be aware of if others see the same thing.

edit:
back on topic - i realise your main issue with the stats was probably the way they have been ranked by hp, rather than the stats themselves but the peak revs and torque figures are also included to give the reader a more rounded view. for most of us (in fact, probably all?) this is academic.... not aware of any A5/S5 owners on vask, are there any?