Quote from: superfueler on April 14, 2024, 07:34:06 AM98 all the way. 

Unless NPD have a special going on

98 all the way. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PBubUidxLI

Chuck With Paul's help builds a yellow beast.

So to summarise the above...
PanNSave95: peak retard 32 degrees or 8 degrees per cylinder
BP95:       peak retard 18 degrees or 4.5 degrees per cylinder
BP98:       peak retard 11 degrees or 3 degrees per cylinder
NPD100:     peak retard 7 degrees or 1.5 degrees per cylinder

You can make your own conclusions about the PakNSave95 fuel, I know I have.

So, taking the PakNSave fuel out of the equation, the cars gained 1.5 degrees of timing going from BP95 to BP98 and then another 1.5 degrees going to NPD100. Note, you will generally only see these gains at high load where the engine is knock limited from achieving MBT timing.

That would be an interesting comparison. By the way, all the graphs above are wide open throttle in either 3rd or 4th gear, so a decent amount of load.

Would be curious to see a comparison between the 98 vendors, BP, Gull & Mobil. With Gull being the anomaly featuring 10% bioethanol.

And no, that's not an offer to provide a tank.

On the FB page occasional discussion arises around different fuels and octane ratings. I've been running my vag cars on 98 RON fuel for as long as I can remember. The owners manuals for my A4s state that 95 RON can be used with an expected reduction in power. With the exhorbitant cost of fuel at present I decided to run a tank of 95 in each of my A4s. In the avant I ran a tank of PakNSave 95 RON and in the sedan a tank of BP 95 RON. I drive both of the cars and I thought they felt a bit flat when on the gas. So I decided to run some logs. Well they told a story - lots of timing retardation due to the poorer knock resistance, especially with the PakNSave fuel. I've recently filled up the sedan with BP 98 RON and the avant with NPD 100 RON and taken some more logs. Massive difference and both cars came alive when on boost. Now both these cars are MTM tuned so likely running more aggressive ignition maps than stock (and certainly more boost than stock). Both cars are the exact same make and model with same ECU and same MTM tune.

Now the graphs... just to explain the 'Retardation Sum of Cyl,' this represents the total retardation of all 4 cylinders. So a number for 6 = average 1.5 degrees retard per cylinder and a number of 32 = average 8 degrees retard per cylinder. As you retard ignition from MBT (minimum timing for best torque) you reduce power output. So here are the results, worst to best...

PakNSave 95 RON (A4 avant)



BP 95 RON (A4 sedan)



BP 98 RON (A4 sedan)



NPN 100 RON (A4 avant)

I've just dragged a mk3 cabriolet 2.0l auto out of a shed having sit for the last 4 years. Parked up due to electrical starting issue.

The current state:
Ignition switch is bad have to jiggle the key to get starter
Only turns over in neutral not park
Runs on engine start
I get fuel if relay bypassed
Relay 30 has been replaced by previous owner
No cel, scanner doesn't recognize ecu
Tacho moves when run on engine start
Can't hear injectors ticking.

I have a 1998 1.8l vento I can rob for some parts like ignition switch.

How do I test ecu power etc?. As that seems to be the likely culprit.

Does the factory RFID chip shut down the ecu if it's faulty?

Can I bypass relay 30 to check its not faulty?

Oh dear!
Well, the car is effectively sold now, as someone has opened the no-reserve bidding (which wiped out the Buy-Now).
Feeling sad.